Talk:SMART criteria
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMART criteria article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 230 days |
PURE goal criteria was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 July 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into SMART criteria. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
CLEAR goal criteria was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 July 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into SMART criteria. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 November 2011. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 230 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ilovesports108.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
New psychology section
[edit]Hi Ilovesports108,
I'm not keen on the new psychology section. It doesn't really relate to smart criteria specifically. It is more about goal setting more generally. That article mentions psychology quite a lot already, but maybe something from the source could be added there. I was tempted to just delete the new words, but I thought it might be a good idea to discuss it first.
Yaris678 (talk) 17:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yup, random fluff only peripherally relevant to the supposed topic of the article. Having just removed an entirely pointless and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility-violating image from this article, I decided to check back, as I had a vague recollection of nominating it for deletion. It turns out that I did so, 10 years ago to the day. [1] Given that nothing appears to have changed, and it is still the same ever-changing poorly-sourced twaddle about motivational management-speak, I may very well do the same again. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Having received no objections. I have deleted to psychology section. Yaris678 (talk) 12:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)